Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer

Re^9: Truly reusable software components

by demerphq (Chancellor)
on Oct 21, 2007 at 12:34 UTC ( #646259=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^8: Truly reusable software components
in thread Truly reusable software components

In the case of Microsoft, and any closed source software development house, the bus is metaphorical, it could be bankruptcy, it could be policy, it could just be management whim. But you are vulnerable, and frankly more vulnerable than you would be if you used open source technology. At least then you have choice, and are not subject to market forces, whimsy or the finances of an external vendor. If necessary you can maintain the codebase yourself or hire someone to do so on your behalf.

Ill agree with you one level however, simply because something is closed source doesn't make it bad, and a lot of people in the linux/open source movement behave immaturely when assessing the quality of a technology based on its openness, (just as many in the closed source world do the other way around). However I mostly mean this on the level that they pretend they have no lessons to learn, which is why certain types of software in their sector is quite frankly pretty damn bad.


  • Comment on Re^9: Truly reusable software components

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://646259]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-06-19 00:42 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (111 votes). Check out past polls.