![]() |
|
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: OO-call bug uncovered & autovivified functions: defined? exists?by ikegami (Patriarch) |
on Oct 29, 2007 at 01:15 UTC ( [id://647766]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Could you please substantiate this? I don't see why the autovivifying behaviour of \&foo is required to call functions not yet defined. In fact, the doesn't seem to be any such need currently.
It's perfectly fine behaviour for sub foo; to create a stub, but that's an unrelated matter.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|