![]() |
|
Do you know where your variables are? | |
PerlMonks |
Re^6: Longest Common Subsequence Questionby sgt (Deacon) |
on Nov 19, 2007 at 14:06 UTC ( #651666=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Humm Makes me think...:) Actually mathematical subsequences are defined as maps on a subset of N and have "holes"; for example consider u(2n) versus u(n). Still in the case of finite sequences (especially in the context of char strings) it seems *contiguous* would be a fair (even natural) requisite. Looking at some implementations seems to indicate that the contiguous case is considered as the common useful case:
I get the same with the recent String::LCSS_XS cheers --stephan
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|