Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (jcwren) Re: Is nodereaper on worst nodes of note?

by $code or die (Deacon)
on Mar 19, 2001 at 00:30 UTC ( #65298=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (jcwren) Re: Is nodereaper on worst nodes of note?
in thread Is nodereaper on worst nodes of note?

Yes, but proportionally, this isn't the case. There are over 750 new users in the last month. I'd guess that only 15 or so monks level 6 and above have actually gone up a level in that time.

I completely agree with jcwren. I'm tired of seeing nodes that have been reaped all over the place. Most of them for no good reason.

Now we have the Editors - they are doing a fantastic job - repairing badly formatted posts. I don't think we need the nodereaper.

$ perldoc perldoc
  • Comment on Re: Re: (jcwren) Re: Is nodereaper on worst nodes of note?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://65298]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2020-10-29 02:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My favourite web site is:












    Results (266 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?