Re^2: can any reply out with a better code than this??

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: can any reply out with a better code than this?? by fenLisesi (Priest) on Dec 06, 2007 at 07:53 UTC
Sorry, asdfghjkl, I confused you by changing the string. Try running it with `ri\d+ri\d+ri\d+` for a match. That was meant to emphasize the use of `\Q...\E`.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: can any reply out with a better code than this?? by asdfghjkl (Initiate) on Dec 06, 2007 at 07:57 UTC
can u suggest me a code from taking both the things from terminal itself....can i print out the matched content with my code properly.i had justed tested out for a few cases like calling some files.etc.......whether it would work for any case like that so that it need to match 3 consecutive times as per the contents of $string	[reply]
Re^5: can any reply out with a better code than this?? by fenLisesi (Priest) on Dec 06, 2007 at 08:06 UTC
Do you mean something like this? `use strict; my $string = 'ri\d+'; while (my $line = <>) { if ($line =~ m{ ( ( \Q$string\E ){3} ) }xms) { print $line; printf qq{\tMatched "$2" x 3: "$1"\n}; } }` [download] Why don't you post a little more of your code "calling some files"?	[reply] [d/l]


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks