Don't ask to ask, just ask | |
PerlMonks |
Removing CODE slot in typeglob / Reversing "use subs ...;"by lodin (Hermit) |
on Jan 03, 2008 at 17:38 UTC ( [id://660264]=perlquestion: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
lodin has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question: I'm attempting to write a constant::lexical pragma and the only unresolved issue as of now is that the constant names are valid barewords even though the constant subroutine has been undefined. This is a major issue as one of the great features of constants is that they normally give compile-time errors if not defined. I don't see any way to do this in pure Perl. I've browsed perldata, perlapi, perlguts, and perlintern for any ideas but I haven't found anything useful. I don't grok most of the guts. Is it possible using XS? Of course, XS is the very last resort. lodin Update: Added stricture and my $false; in the eval to make the test actually work.
Back to
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|