Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses

Re: Trolling for Worst Nodes

by Argel (Prior)
on Jan 18, 2008 at 02:43 UTC ( #663001=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Trolling for Worst Nodes

If nothing else, I think Anonymous Monks should not be allowed to see the Worst Nodes list. I'm not sure what level is a good starting point, but I would agree it needs to be at least level two. Level 5: Beadle comes to mind since that's when a user can have a homenode and can ask categorized questions. On the other hand, level 5 seems a little too high.

I really don't like the idea of further restricing some nodes to just certain groups or levels. However, if it were going to be done I'd set the bar much lower: either Level 5: Beadle, Friar (level 10), or at worst to Saints in our Book. But as I said, I'd prefer no further restrictions.

Update: fixed grammar and broken id:// link; slight rewording.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://663001]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (1)
As of 2021-02-25 05:47 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found