Thanks, I think that's working now :)
However, I don't think I understand the difference between "# another way, since @_ is an alias:" and what I was doing.. Is it because by assigning a reference to $_[0] (say) $_[0] would then be a reference to a reference? And if so, would my code have worked if I'd added an extra dereferencer (e.g. $$$_[0] instead of $$_[0]), or is that just nonsense?!
| [reply] |
I don't think I understand the difference between "# another way, since @_ is an alias:"
In Perl, everything is passed by reference. To avoid confusion with Perl references — an unrelated concept — this is known as "aliasing" in the Perl world.
When a function is called, the elements of @_ are aliased to the arguments in the caller. Changes to @_ will be reflected in the arguments passed to the function.
In the following snippet, $_[0] is aliased to $x, and $_[1] is aliased to $y. Notice how changing @_ changed $x and $y, and notice how no references — and no dereferencing — were used.
sub func {
print("f-pre: $_[0], $_[1]\n");
$_[0] = 5;
$_[1] = 6;
print("f-post: $_[0], $_[1]\n");
}
my $x = 3;
my $y = 4;
print("pre: $x, $y\n");
func($x, $y);
print("post: $x, $y\n");
pre: 3, 4
f-pre: 3, 4
f-post: 5, 6
post: 5, 6
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
sub my_sub {
my ($arg1, $arg2) = @_;
...
}
The assignment to another variable breaks the alias, so if you change $arg1, @_ will not be modified. But if you modify @_ directly, | [reply] [d/l] [select] |