|
|
| No such thing as a small change | |
| PerlMonks |
My first death-threat on Perl Monks ;-)by frankus (Priest) |
| on Mar 26, 2001 at 09:13 UTC ( [id://67156]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
Of all the responses this is my favourite. I'm surprised it's not got more votes than my comment. If you've read the question 1, I hope you'll see it's not a "how should objects be used" question; it's a "how should I abuse objects.." question, tye's and tilly's comments were more salient for me (FWIW). Not to say the others missed the point, I've learnt some new OO good practices, thankyou :-). I've ++ all the comments in a thread, since they're all well written and to see what other folk think of the responses, if people ++ a statement more than I'd expect then I look a harder at the comment, to see if I've missed anything. 1. For me "Hacking Objects in Perl" means elegantly ignoring OO principles to achieve what I want. I could do neat Objects but not in this job ;^) --Brother Frankus.
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||