Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re^2: phantom subroutine parameter values

by rpelak (Sexton)
on Apr 15, 2008 at 03:53 UTC ( #680425=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: phantom subroutine parameter values
in thread phantom subroutine parameter values

Thanks guys. I knew it was something simple... That explains why a lot of my old code doesn't have ampersands... Sucks be forced to program in tcl for a few years... rpelak
  • Comment on Re^2: phantom subroutine parameter values

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: phantom subroutine parameter values
by Discipulus (Monsignor) on Apr 16, 2008 at 08:00 UTC
    uh?! it seems a feature! in any case i like calling with the & 'cause i spot easy subroutine's calling.

    if i understand :
    sub refinemydata { my $data = shift; &is_refined:return?&rerefine;}
    could be a valid syntax too ?
    something new

      The ampersand is functional, not decorative. &func(args) is not the same as func(args). The function's prototype is ignored in the former. And &func, &func() and func() are all different. @_ is left untouched by the first.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://680425]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-11-14 17:36 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My code is most likely broken because:

    Results (175 votes). Check out past polls.