Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks vroom
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Why is 'our' good?

by Dominus (Parson)
on Mar 30, 2001 at 14:08 UTC ( [id://68389]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.


in reply to Why is 'our' good?

The other big problem with our() is that it is advertised as a replacement for use vars:
NOTE: The functionality provided by this pragma has been superseded by our declarations, available in Perl v5.6.0 or later. See the our entry in the perlfunc manpage.
But there are several things that vars does that our() doesn't do. The benefit, as you point out, is a very limited gain of functionality, and the cost is that there is yet one more subtly different feature complicating Perl's byzantine scoping and namespace rules.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re (tilly) 2: Why is 'our' good?
by tilly (Archbishop) on Mar 31, 2001 at 03:20 UTC

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://68389]
help
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Notices?
    hippoepoptai's answer Re: how do I set a cookie and redirect was blessed by hippo!
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.