Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: links: text only browser with table support!

by alfie (Pilgrim)
on Apr 03, 2001 at 11:44 UTC ( #69230=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to links: text only browser with table support!

I found w3m more useful (and, I found it earlier than links ;). It is quite fast, and as aditional feature to links: It can handle user authentication - which links can't and is a feature I really need. Also I couldn't find a way to make links dump a frameset, which is also possible with w3m.
--
Alfie
  • Comment on Re: links: text only browser with table support!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(jptxs) Re: links: text only browser with table support! w3m IS better!
by jptxs (Curate) on Apr 04, 2001 at 05:20 UTC
    alfie is TOTALLY right!!!

    w3m rules! It's quite superior, and, the best part, over which I almost fell over, it launches me into vi when i come to edit this text box! something i didn't not know until I came here to write a good review which has turned into an absolute rave!!! =)

    "A man's maturity -- consists in having found again the seriousness one had as a child, at play." --Nietzsche
      Thanks for the nice response :-) It's funny though that w3m was originally done as a replacement for less - as a pager.
      To those win32 users out there - there are also binaries for that os (you need cygwin IIRC).

      And thanks for the URL you found, jptxs, I haven't known about that one.
      --
      Alfie

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://69230]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2022-05-18 03:31 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you prefer to work remotely?



    Results (68 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?