Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

by nanotasher (Novice)
on Jul 09, 2008 at 15:44 UTC ( [id://696480]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?
in thread DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?

That seems a little silly to me. Hypothetically speaking, of course.. If I bought Oracle, then MS offered me a better deal, I'd have sunk costs from buying Oracle. It wouldn't make any sense to switch to Oracle. I think the nightmare of transporting the data from one database to another more than offsets the nightmare of tying yourself to a vendor's stored procedure methods (which, by the way, exist in all major RDBMS software).

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://696480]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-03-28 23:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found