in reply to Re^3: DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures? in thread DBD::Oracle faster with bound sql than stored procedures?
That seems a little silly to me.
Hypothetically speaking, of course.. If I bought Oracle, then MS offered me a better deal, I'd have sunk costs from buying Oracle. It wouldn't make any sense to switch to Oracle.
I think the nightmare of transporting the data from one database to another more than offsets the nightmare of tying yourself to a vendor's stored procedure methods (which, by the way, exist in all major RDBMS software).
|