Re: Bug in substitution operator?

[setebos]

Dont' you mean the following?

s/\{verbatim\}/\{$hash{whatever}\}/ for @lines;

[polettix]

The actual substitution isn't important in the original post; the fact is that using braces to enclose the substitution part leads to some behaviour that's not what I expected.

As you may see in the OP, I already found a solution/workaround to get what I wanted (i.e. using square brackets instead of braces); what I'm asking here is if this behaviour is buggy or not.