Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Can we make it less work to generate Newest Nodes?

by jettero (Monsignor)
on Jan 21, 2009 at 20:46 UTC ( #737944=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Can we make it less work to generate Newest Nodes?

Maybe you should clear your last read time? I only get a day or two's worth of nodes and when I click more settings it says, "Your 'last checked' time is not set. Newest Nodes will show you nodes created during the preceding 24 hours."

-Paul

  • Comment on Re: Can we make it less work to generate Newest Nodes?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Can we make it less work to generate Newest Nodes?
by talexb (Canon) on Jan 21, 2009 at 21:01 UTC
      Maybe you should clear your last read time?

    Yes, of course. :) I know that. But I'm concerned that if I forget (which I appear to have done), that the web server will serve up six months worth of stuff. There's no way I could read all of those nodes. Even a month's worth would be a pile of stuff to get through.

    Alex / talexb / Toronto

    "Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://737944]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2020-04-01 18:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    The most amusing oxymoron is:
















    Results (18 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?