Have you seen field of dreams? :)
But seriously, like I outlined, I think it'd be attractive to many intermediate Perl programmers like myself. | [reply] |
If you can get the "critical mass" of contribution, yes, I think you'll be able to sustain a somewhat steady-state influx, replacing your ultra-newbies and replacing your not-as-newbies who can answer simple Perl questions (and an overlap of people who both ask and answer questions).
Heck, I'd love to see several of the obsessive PerlMonks posters be pickier about what they initially reply to. I suspect many junior monks feel like they can almost never answer a question (as I've seen several of them express). That prevents them from getting a whole nother level of satisfaction from PerlMonks. Sure, there are advantages to simple questions quickly getting answers from someone who usually gets the answer at least mostly correct. But I see real advantages to having a wider variety of answers. A "less correct" answer often leads to some interesting and enlightening discussion (especially when it doesn't lead to a more senior Perler "putting 'm in their place" for daring to answer less correctly). And a "less correct" answer is often at a more appropriate level to be appreciated and thus helpful to the original asker.
I tend not to answer nodes that I believe others can answer about as well or better than I, unless the node has gone unanswered for an unusual length of time. So I'm more likely to answer a node that I believe I may have an unusual insight into. I love it when a very basic question gets answered by somebody with roughly the same experience level as the person asking but who happens to know something about that specific subject.
I suspect a lot of junior monks see PerlMonks very similar to how I see stackoverflow.com. At any point in time, it is extremely unlikely that I have anything worth contributing to stackoverflow.com (in part because the stated purpose of the site discourages diversions into tangential subjects). So, sure, skimming through stackoverflow can yield me some gems of knowledge, but it sure isn't much fun. I'm sure it will become more useful to me as a place to find via googling for some specific answer (which is a big part of its goal), but it sure isn't any place I'm going to be "hanging out" at or even "reading".
But, as a senior Monk pointed out on some other site, you can't stop know-it-alls from jumping in over and over. So it might be worthwhile to have a place that offers a culture of telling the know-it-alls to go to PerlMonks if they want to "go all PerlMonks" on people.
Of course, building a web site and then getting it to critical mass without having the growth end up killing the site can be quite a challenge. All of those growing pains at PerlMonks predate my tenure so I'll offer no advice on that. But good luck!
| [reply] |
Thank you very much :)
I suspect many junior monks feel like they can almost never answer a question (as I've seen several of them express).
This is true, it's how I feel and I've seen others express this as well. Helping people at the bottom would create a greater sense of worth for those in the middle.
I'm glad other people can understand my views and aims with this. I was starting to think I'm going mad :S
Lyle
| [reply] |
I am confused as to your definition of 'intermediate' then. You want the place to be newbie-based, which, as you outlined, will lead to newbie questions. Why will the intermediate programmers want to stick around if all they do is try to explain how to interpolate variables into strings?
Like others have said, it is a good idea in theory~
And you didn't even know bears could type.
| [reply] |
Why do I run a free Perl programming course? Because it's rewarding. I'm sure for many of the people here it's more about the feeling of reward and worth they get from helping people than what they learn.
| [reply] |
