|
|
| Perl: the Markov chain saw | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^5: Perl vs Cby ikegami (Patriarch) |
| on Mar 14, 2009 at 23:04 UTC ( [id://750677]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Yes, you've already said that. And you said it was the same for Perl. I replied that in Perl, you do know.
Since when were we talking about syntax? Our posts are entirely about operand evaluation order.
Since when were we talking about operator precedence? Our posts are entirely about operand evaluation order.
Nothing. Operand evaluation order has been unchanged for at least a decade, probably since day one, and its the intention of developers not to change it. They couldn't even if they wanted because it would break existing in subtle ways.
Of course. And I gave two examples of clear code that relies on operand evaluation order.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||