Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Joe
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (tye)Re: Why not support this syntax?

by MeowChow (Vicar)
on Apr 24, 2001 at 16:27 UTC ( [id://75126]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.


in reply to (tye)Re: Why not support this syntax?
in thread Why not support this syntax?

I think you meant:
if ($min > $x > $max) { ... }
What you're implicitly suggesting is that Perl would change symantics from && between inequalities to ||, but how could perl possibly know when to do this and when not to? Eg. in my original expression, what would Perl do if $x was greater than $max? I think your example can more sensibly be expressed as:
unless ($min < $x < $max) { ... }
   MeowChow                                   
               s aamecha.s a..a\u$&owag.print

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(tye)Re2: Why not support this syntax?
by tye (Sage) on Apr 24, 2001 at 16:40 UTC

    See, I told you I can't understand code that uses >. (:

    But you just illustrated more problems with this. For example, your last line should have been: unless(  $min <= $x <= $max  ) But I don't find those compelling reasons to not implement it. If someone actually managed to produce a patch for this I wouldn't be opposed to it.

            - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://75126]
help
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Notices?
    hippoepoptai's answer Re: how do I set a cookie and redirect was blessed by hippo!
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.