Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Re^2: Is there a better way to learn Tk?

by pobocks (Chaplain)
on May 09, 2009 at 05:52 UTC ( #763011=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Is there a better way to learn Tk?
in thread Is there a better way to learn Tk?

Do you know what the performance/requirements difference between the two packages is, by any chance? What I can find seems to indicate that Perl/Tk directly wraps the C code for Tk, whereas Tkx wraps Tcl calls Tk. I can't imagine that not causing some performance difference.

for(split(" ","tsuJ rehtonA lreP rekcaH")){print reverse . " "}print "\b.\n";

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is there a better way to learn Tk?
by Anonymous Monk on May 09, 2009 at 06:23 UTC
    perl/Tk is probably faster, but Tkx is more up to date in terms of features/widgets and will run on perl 5.6.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://763011]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2018-06-21 22:37 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (120 votes). Check out past polls.