|
|
| No such thing as a small change | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Re: validateMaskby idnopheq (Chaplain) |
| on May 08, 2001 at 23:41 UTC ( [id://78992]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
Well, about the valid subnets I left out ... I guess I'm just prejudiced. HHOJ. But seriously, folks, I was going of the top of my head for masks, and missed some. I thought I was ~so~ crafty! As I reflected later while drooling on a table in a meeting, it would be better to test by powers of 2, maybe ... I still have crusty residue on the corners of my mouth. For contiguous ones followed by contiguous zeros, I do test, actually. That's what $net tracks ... if we get an octet other than 255 or 0, set it to one. If any of the subsequent octets have a value other than 0, it's no good. I think I like your solution better. I'll play w/ it. Thanks to all two of you who responded thus far!
HTH
In Section
Cool Uses for Perl
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||