Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Using can With Inheritance

by btrott (Parson)
on Apr 18, 2000 at 22:07 UTC ( [id://7940]=perltutorial: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Using can With Inheritance

This started out as a Q & A on using can, so that's how it'll start.

If you asked, "How can I determine whether a particular object has a particular method?", an answer would be:

Use the can method on your object. From perlobj:

can(METHOD) can checks to see if its object has a method called METHOD. If it +does then a reference to the sub is returned; if it does not then undef + is returned.

A Scenario

This is relatively simple and straightforward. I found a rather interesting use for it the other day, though. Here was the scenario:

I had created (basically) an abstract base class for holding a tree-like data structure. The base class contained all of the methods necessary to interact with the data structure--to get data out, to put data in, etc.

But the base class didn't have any notion of how to read the data in from an external source; that was to be provided by the subclasses.

So I also defined two subclasses: one for processing XML data and one for processing a different format.

The base class also had a recurse method--supplied with a callback method, it would recurse into the data structure and call the callback for each node found in the tree. I had defined some simple callbacks: one to pretty-print the data to the screen; one to dump the data in HTML format using unordered lists; and one to write the file to disk in either XML or this other format. These callbacks were "private" functions, though, so I also provided accessor methods to return sub references to the callbacks.

A Problem

The problem, though, was that these accessor methods were defined in my base class, and I wanted to allow for my subclasses to override the callback methods. However, I (obviously) wouldn't know whether or not they overrode the methods until run-time, so I couldn't hard-code the subclass name into my accessor functions.

A Solution

So I used can. When I defined a new object, it was blessed into one of my subclasses; so, in my accessor methods, I realized that I could call can with the callback method name as the argument, and I'd get back the "correct" version of the callback method.

So, for example, here's a stripped-down version of my base class:

package A; # stuff taken out sub get_write_file_func { my $self = shift; return $self->can("_write_file"); }
The method "_write_file" is defined in my subclasses, so here's an example one of those:
package A::B; use A; use vars qw/@ISA/; @ISA = qw/A/; # stuff taken out sub _write_file { my($path, $val, $start) = @_; # ... }

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Using can With Inheritance
by JadeNB (Chaplain) on Jul 22, 2008 at 23:19 UTC
    I think that you are manually implementing inheritance. The following code: prints "Writing in package A::B" (followed by a newline, of course!), which seems to be what you want. The point is that, even though write_file is a method in package A, it's calling _write_file on an object blessed into package A::B. Am I misunderstanding what you're trying to do?

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perltutorial [id://7940]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-07-21 23:20 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    erzuuli‥ 🛈The London Perl and Raku Workshop takes place on 26th Oct 2024. If your company depends on Perl, please consider sponsoring and/or attending.