Re: Including code without packaging?

[mikfire]

I could be slightly annoying and point out Config::IniFiles already exists. Then again, "rolling your own" can frequently be fun.

As to your exact question, I would make a package anyway. It only adds a few lines to the file and I can almost promise you this code will grow. More functions will be added, maybe some different variables to control how errors are handled, etc. If you start with a package now, it will save you some hassle later.

Of course, ymmv
mikfire

[traveler]

When I check cpan for this I can only access the README, the module gives a "Not Found". Is this a CPAN problem or has the module been removed?

[mikfire]

Go here and click on the Latest Release link. That worked for me
mikfire

[Madams]

I agree with your viewpoint..I personally have a module named MyUtilities where i just stuff algos i use over and over. One day a REAL module may just spontaneously jump out of it. Meanwhile i use it just like a junk drawer for code... :)
_________________
[e-mail]

              (__)
              (\/)
       /-------\/
      / | 666 ||
     *  ||----||