I'm sure you don't want to use this in real code
Except, maybe, on a day I am very angry to my co-workers :-P
I really appreciate your elaborate idea (wonderful analysis!), but it bites us from behind: By the replication step in your transformation, you introduce two anonymous subs which are exactly identical, so being good programmers, we will of course give a name to the sub and end up with only one copy of the subroutine; but as soon we do this, we have just traded the name of a hash for a name of a sub (and indeed, this can be done with any other data element as well), so it's not a real gain...
--
Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>