Re: Subroutine chaining idiom requested

This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.

Is it just me, or is everything on this site turning into a golf challenge? =)

FouRPlaY
Learning Perl or Going To die() Trying

Comment on Re: Subroutine chaining idiom requested

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by Ovid (Cardinal) on May 24, 2001 at 17:42 UTC
FouRPlaY wrote: Is it just me, or is everything on this site turning into a golf challenge? =) 78 letters. My solution: Imagining? Does all here become golf? 37 letters. Though with English, one might argue that I've altered the meaning. Cheers, Ovid Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.	[reply]
Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by tilly (Archbishop) on May 24, 2001 at 17:51 UTC
35 characters. :-) Imagining? Turns all here to golf? And restucturing produces the 29 character logical equivalent of: All here to golf or me only. I don't think that can be improved much. :-)	[reply]
Re: Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by chromatic (Archbishop) on May 24, 2001 at 23:06 UTC
Let's drop 10 characters. PM's now golf only? Update: I'm striving for a complete sentence. Call that -w/strict/English golf.	[reply]
(ar0n) Re (2): Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by ar0n (Priest) on May 24, 2001 at 23:35 UTC
Re: Re: Re (tilly) 1: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by japhy (Canon) on May 24, 2001 at 23:38 UTC
Re (tilly) 5: (Ovid - more golf?) Re(2): Subroutine chaining idiom requested by tilly (Archbishop) on May 24, 2001 at 23:45 UTC

• hippo

• erzuuli

‥ Anonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.


Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
	PerlMonks