Re^2: Next Language to Learn

> Haskell ?

Well I'm the only one in my local perlmongers group not learning or talking about Haskell for 1½ years now.

And so far I haven't seen anyone of them using it in any "useful" manner...

IMHO its not even a hype like Ruby, it's mostly only "chic".

I have the impression many communities are mostly positive about Haskell is due to the fact that subconsciously they don't consider it a serious threat.

No flame intended...

Cheers Rolf

Comment on Re^2: Next Language to Learn

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Next Language to Learn by tinita (Parson) on Mar 31, 2010 at 09:36 UTC
It can be quite an eye-opener to learn a functional language. On some universities the first language you learn is a functional language. When I started studying computer science I had never programmed before, so for me learning a functional language (Miranda in that case) was like doing mathematics on the computer. Seemed very natural (all the others having written programs in C already found Miranda really really strange... ;-)	[reply]
Re^3: Next Language to Learn by rovf (Priest) on Mar 30, 2010 at 15:28 UTC
IMHO its not even a hype like Ruby, it's mostly only "chic". It is chic. I didn't suggest it because of this though, neither for its general usefulness (I don't want to open this box of worms), but because the OP expressed explicitly: .... so that I can improve my overall programming language skill set I could equally well have proposed Prolog, BCPL or Scheme.... -- Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Next Language to Learn by LanX (Sage) on Mar 30, 2010 at 15:36 UTC
Sorry I didn't intend to criticize you, it's only my personal impression after a long indoctrination... Me, I'm rather interested to realize different paradigms in Perl, maybe by extending the language. (even if it provokes the resistance of local clerics... ;) Cheers Rolf	[reply]
Re^5: Next Language to Learn by rovf (Priest) on Mar 31, 2010 at 07:37 UTC
Sorry I didn't intend to criticize you I didn't interpret it that way ;-) I'm rather interested to realize different paradigms in Perl, maybe by extending the language. For instance it would be interesting to see, how easy/clumsy it is to retrofit lazy evaluation into Perl. With enough pertinacity, every language can be made to look like LISP :-D -- Ronald Fischer <ynnor@mm.st>	[reply] [d/l]
Re^6: Next Language to Learn by LanX (Sage) on Mar 31, 2010 at 11:12 UTC
Re^7: Next Language to Learn by rovf (Priest) on Mar 31, 2010 at 12:34 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here


We don't bite newbies here... much
	PerlMonks