Re^3: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways

Both these two would leak, I fear. The only safe way is to call

-command=>[\&function,\$arg1,\$arg2]
[download]

Comment on Re^3: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 16, 2010 at 15:16 UTC
By adding `\$arg1,\$arg2`, the memory leak goes away? I don't think so.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^5: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 16, 2010 at 21:15 UTC
Not only by adding the references, but also by including them into a list instead of using them directly. We tested it hundred times, really.	[reply]
Re^6: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 16, 2010 at 22:17 UTC
That would be awesome, except you seem to have forgotten to post the test.	[reply]
Re^7: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways by choroba (Cardinal) on Apr 17, 2010 at 20:22 UTC
Re^8: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways by ikegami (Patriarch) on Apr 18, 2010 at 00:00 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^8: what is difference between calling the function in Perl/Tk in the following ways by lamprecht (Friar) on Apr 18, 2010 at 23:15 UTC


Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies.
	PerlMonks