Re^2: eval'ing coderef with ampersand

[hbm]

That is a subtle and significant difference. What I'm really doing is forking a list of processes; and I was alarmed that one process executed when I defined the list, prior to forking.

Do you know where this is documented? I haven't seen it in perlref, my Cookbook, or elsewhere.

Thanks!

[ikegami]

perlop says "Unary '\' creates a reference to whatever follows it." and refers you to perlref.

perlref shows special that \&handler is the means of getting a reference to a function.

\handler and \handler() are clearly not special cases, so the \ applies to the value returned by the expressions that follows. They could be written \( handler ) and \( handler() ).

The behaviour of \&handler() is not documented, but there's only one parsing that wouldn't result in an error: \( &handler() ).