it indentifies no differences. Did you forget to post them?
You somehow failed to notice the very first sentence of that very post? Including the emphasis I applied to the word 'operand'.
And then again failed to notice the strikeout I applied to that same word when I re-quoted your phrase later in that same post?
What more do I have to do to draw attention to the fact that you were discussing something that doesn't appear anywhere in the passage I quoted?
What other conclusion can be drawn from your complete failure to accept the obvious?
And (Damn it) You succeeded in drawing me into a meta-argument. So, I'm done.
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
|