laziness, impatience, and hubris | |
PerlMonks |
Re^2: What is "aggressive" argument?by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Nov 23, 2010 at 01:18 UTC ( [id://873091]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Your problem isn't new. Hm. (Inevitably:) You're wrong. Or, you might be right, but not in the way you think. You see, I know why people find me a disagreeable man. There are flavours of course, but mostly, it's because I am. My only "problem" here is why other people think I should change. More importantly, why do they think that I should want to change. This place isn't a part of my social life. Just a place where I pass time by attempting to solve interesting problems. As I said somewhere else in this thread, I find programming problems infinitely more interesting and challenging than crosswords or sudoku. Every now and again something I post seems to help the OP and that's nice. And when it doesn't, that okay too, because I probably had fun doing it anyway. I wish it were possible to have in-depth, technical discussions here, without people taking disagreement with their ideas, code or logic, as attacks on their person; or them resorting to attacks on my person when their technical arguments are exhausted or disproved. It used to be possible. Just as a person does not have to be beautiful, to do something beautiful; they do not have to be stupid, to do or say something stupid. To say: "That is stupid" is not to say: "You are stupid"; but that distinction seems lost here these days. I remember when I first came here, I was admonished: "Stop being so damn polite!". Well, this place has knocked it out of me. So, if those with whom I have disagreements, see me as "disagreeable" all I can do is own that. Nice poem by the way. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Meditations
|
|