Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: Anonymous Monk?

by Anonymous Monk
on Jan 18, 2011 at 08:05 UTC ( [id://882824]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: Anonymous Monk?
in thread Anonymous Monk?

In hindsight, perhaps I was suggesting we abandon the current conceit and adopt a new one.

If you want to change it, you should point out exactly what goes wrong and how your new concept would solve this. And discuss about the drawbacks of your concept. Simple stating "anonymity is bad" and "we need change" is not enough.

and btw.: I like the current way the monastery works

How about we pretend instead to be politicians in the government of a representative democracy?

You mean we should pretend to be incompetent in all areas? Except in filling our own swiss bank-accounts by selling the interest of the public to well-paying lobby-groups? I don't see how this can improve this site...

(posted as anonymous monk, so this posting cannot be connected to me in case I decide to start a political career in the future ;-)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://882824]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2025-07-16 05:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?
    erzuuliAnonymous Monks are no longer allowed to use Super Search, due to an excessive use of this resource by robots.