Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: RE: RE: Monks with control over Anonymous?

by vroom (Pope)
on Apr 25, 2000 at 18:17 UTC ( #8967=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: RE: RE: Monks with control over Anonymous?
in thread Monks with control over Anonymous?

I agree the reputation of nodes created by Anonymous Monks should be ranked for quality just like any others, but Anonymous Monk shouldn't get XP. Basically I just need to short-circuit where a user gains XP if the owner of that node is Anonymoous Monk.

My original thought was that users above a certain level would get certain editorship powers and I didn't want Anonymous Monk to have any of those for obvious reasons.

vroom | Tim Vroom | vroom@cs.hope.edu

  • Comment on RE: RE: RE: RE: Monks with control over Anonymous?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Monks with control over Anonymous?
by kryten (Scribe) on Apr 26, 2000 at 12:13 UTC
    I would be very surprised, if Anonymous Monk were allowed to have XP, if it ended up with a positive XP balance :)
    but yes. AM needs to be unable to do anything powerful.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://8967]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-06-19 17:24 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (114 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?