Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re^4: ORG to POD translator

by LanX (Bishop)
on Apr 07, 2011 at 22:42 UTC ( #898218=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: ORG to POD translator
in thread ORG to POD translator

Thats quite abstract and overwhelming.

IMHO formulating concrete use cases and goals is the first step for improvement.

Producing POD is pretty concrete, and not far from being sufficiently done.

What do you want to produce? Do you want to support all export formats emacs knows?

I'm not such a heavy org-mode user like you are, you need to formulate your needs.

Cheers Rolf

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: ORG to POD translator
by MidLifeXis (Monsignor) on Apr 07, 2011 at 22:59 UTC

    With this one-off script, no. The script is good at what it does. My comments were only things that jumped out as low-hanging fruit. In fact, beyond those couple of changes, I would probably not make any other changes to this.

    My goal for processing org-mode files with Perl (not this script) would be as I listed above - manipulating the files, nodes, and properties / drawers. educated_foo stated below, "only org-mode can parse Org". I agree with that mostly. I would love to see the org community stabilize the format, and let org-mode (or respond to the data within that format. The content of the properties and nodes, based on how the configuration is set, determine how the library reacts.

    This script solves a very focused problem, and I am not suggesting that that scope be broadened, just that some of the edge cases in parsing some of the org-mode files that may be seen get fixed.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://898218]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-07-22 05:26 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

    Results (451 votes). Check out past polls.