|
|
|
| There's more than one way to do things | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Re (tilly) 8: To sub or not to sub, that is the question?by dragonchild (Archbishop) |
| on Jun 27, 2001 at 14:48 UTC ( [id://91934]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
*is very thoughtful*
I read the JavaWorld article you referenced. It made me realize something - All the OOP I've ever done has really been procedural programming using inheritance and some, very basic encapsulation. I've been thinking about OOD as a way of collecting data in a stronger struct, one that has functions associated with it naturally. But, after seeing the concept "An object is defined by its capabilities" ... I need to revamp my thinking a whole lot. While I appreciate your ideas on the get() function, and would implement many of them if I actually implemented this, I want to explore further what exactly is involved in "true OOD", if such a thing exists.
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||