|
|
|
Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot |
|
| PerlMonks |
Reading comprehension?by tilly (Archbishop) |
| on Jun 27, 2001 at 22:13 UTC ( [id://92089]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
This is an archived low-energy page for bots and other anonmyous visitors. Please sign up if you are a human and want to interact.
You gave an example of an answer, after which people should know what to look up. I pointed out legitimate reasons why a beginner would find that answer not helpful, and then proceeded to say that the answer is one I would give, but I would handle possible confusion by being ready with a list of useful references if the follow-up indicated confusion. How did you get from that to the insane conclusion that I thought all posts should include the documentation for everything you used in answering the question? People with unexpectedly poor backgrounds are like possible tangents in a conversation. They come up every so often, and you handle them with a lazy algorithm. If the person apparently has less background than your first response assumed, you deal with it by politely pointing out appropriate existing answers and tools.
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||