Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses

Re^3: XP for Consideration

by Anonymous Monk
on Oct 20, 2011 at 03:52 UTC ( #932549=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: XP for Consideration
in thread XP for Consideration

The group of editors is large enough.

Reallly? There are 14 janitors, at least 5 haven't visited in over a month, at least 2 are puling double duty as gods

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: XP for Consideration
by GrandFather (Sage) on Oct 20, 2011 at 04:41 UTC

    Yes, really. The workload is not high. If you take a look at Recent janitorial edits you will see there are a couple of edits a week. The other criteria of interest is having good time zone coverage by the Janitors and that I think we have. So yes I think we really do have enough Janitors.

    True laziness is hard work

        It seems not. A really interested anonymonk could sign up, but I doubt that page would provide a level of excitement that would warrant the effort. There are other much better reasons to join up of course that do make it worth the effort, but hey, it's anonymonk.

        True laziness is hard work

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://932549]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-06-23 16:18 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (125 votes). Check out past polls.