The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
Re^4: example of 'm / / m' related example and compare to 'm / / s'by Anonymous Monk |
on Nov 29, 2011 at 19:17 UTC ( [id://940684]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Hm. That's like advocating always taking a swimsuit & sunblock and a raincoat & umbrella cos it saves listening to the weather forecast. /m and /s don't add functionality. They modify functionality. So using /ms is more like rewiring your oddly designed radio so that the tuning dial and the volume control actually work as you expect...thereby—for example—enabling you to successfully listen to weather forecasts. The very reason it is hard, even for long-time Perlers with scads of frequent regex user miles, to remember which (/s /m) does what, is because they are so rarely required. I'd argue that they are often required, just rarely used correctly. In my experience, matching start- and end-of-line is far more commonly needed that matching start- and end-of-string. The default behaviour is wrong practically every time anyone has to deal with multi-line data. Likewise, the vast majority of .* instances I see in deployed code are being used as "match anything", which they don't. BTW, it's easy to remember which is which: /s alters the behaviour of a single metacharacter (.) whereas /m alters the behaviour of multiple metacharacters (^ and $). By using them everywhere they become the norm Yes, that's precisely the point. The modified behaviours they provide should have been the norm from the start. after a while people stop asking themselves why is he using that here. And that is bad. Except that using them everywhere actually makes regexes work the way most people mistakenly think they already work. So even if they don't ask themselves why, they still get the "expected" behaviour. In other words, using /ms consistently on regexes makes the (idiosyncratic) behaviour of regexes conform to people's (reasonable) expectations, rather than vice versa. It's a simple technique that fixes an infelicity in Perl 5. And that's why PBP recommends it. Damian
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|