note
chacham
<p>Cute. :)</p>
<p>According to <A Href = "http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/intro001.htm#i1712">Oracle's version of history</A>, it is--and indeed should be--sequel. I'm bigoted along with them, and look down on the es queue ellers.</p>
<p>What's funny is, you can tell based on grammar. Oracle uses "a SQL statement". IBM uses "an SQL statement". Which means that Oracle considers IBM to be incorrect about their own invention.</p>
<p>Wouldn't be the first time. :)</p>
941905
941926