Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by choroba (Cardinal) on Feb 28, 2012 at 00:21 UTC
|
I use Emacs for Perl scripting. I have no problems with the arrow operator. What major mode did you use? I recommend cperl. | [reply] [d/l] |
|
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by ambrus (Abbot) on Feb 28, 2012 at 11:59 UTC
|
| [reply] |
|
It could do with an update, I'm missing notepad++ and Kate.
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by GrandFather (Saint) on Feb 28, 2012 at 00:06 UTC
|
I've not used it to any extent (I use Komodo which is very good, but not cheap), but many people like Padre.
True laziness is hard work
| [reply] |
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by tobyink (Canon) on Feb 28, 2012 at 01:04 UTC
|
| [reply] |
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by trizen (Hermit) on Feb 28, 2012 at 00:13 UTC
|
Personally, I use Geany. It has a very good syntax highlighting. | [reply] |
|
I also use Geany as my GUI-oriented editor, both on Windows and Linux. I like that I don't have to think about different shortcuts when I switch between environments. And feels light-weight; doesn't get in the way. I'm not a big fan of elaborate IDE's. I do some work in MS Visual Studio (non-Perl-related stuff) and for all its bells and whistles I still wish for simplicity.
| [reply] |
|
does Geany support correct/automatic code-indentation? When I took a look into it 2 weeks ago I wasn't able to figure out how.
>I like that I don't have to think about different shortcuts when I switch between environments.
indeed an ugly problem, I solved it by resetting/aliasing the usual control keys in emacs to mainstream - like x,c,v,a,z,f - which was tricky because I needed to elaborate some DWIM decisions to support the old functionality.
And most people have such problems of conflicts with "muscle memory" of there fingers.
E.g. I know people who try making there Firefox behave like VI with add-ons like vimperator.
| [reply] |
|
|
|
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by perl.j (Pilgrim) on Feb 28, 2012 at 00:23 UTC
|
I use the Vim editor as it is simple yet EXTREMELY powerful.
| [reply] |
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by JavaFan (Canon) on Feb 28, 2012 at 01:13 UTC
|
I use vi (available on real Unix systems), a vi-clone of my choice (available on most platforms), or vim if I cannot avoid it (Linux boxes I haven't had the chance to install something sensible). It works for me, so I call it a good Perl/C/HTML/shell/SQL/Python/mail/news/plain text/Java/Pascal/awk/Ruby editor.
But I use black on gray for all my highlighting; so, I would never have a problem with arrows. | [reply] [d/l] |
|
Just out of curiosity, why the preference for vi over vim? I've always thought of vim as a more advanced version of vi.
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by dHarry (Abbot) on Feb 28, 2012 at 16:17 UTC
|
I've been using Eclipse with the EPIC plugin on Windows (various), Linux (various) and lately Mac OSX. It has served me well over the years and behaves almost identical on all platforms (the Mac being the exception...). It has tons of features and some very useful plugins.
If you don't mind spending money you might give the komodo a try. I have only played with the free trial but it looked good.
Cheers
Harry
| [reply] |
Re: A good editor for Perl sources
by elTriberium (Friar) on Feb 28, 2012 at 19:11 UTC
|
I'm also using Komodo IDE, got a license at work for it.
It's very good, however my biggest complaint is that it doesn't understand Moose code, for example autocomplete doesn't work with my Moose modules. So I disabled autocomplete completely as it doesn't make sense for me.
On that note: Does anybody know a Perl IDE which understands Moose code for features like autocomplete?
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
|
Cool, good to know that this exists, although I'm not an emacs-fan.
If only somebody would do the same for Komodo or vim. Sure, I could try that myself, but I'm not yet annoyed enough to do that ;)
| [reply] |
|