|
|
| The stupid question is the question not asked | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Interesting read: "Why I use perl and still hate dynamic language weenies too"by Anonymous Monk |
| on Mar 08, 2012 at 09:16 UTC ( [id://958447]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
These examples and many, many more can easily show a tremendous difference in both the length and maintainability of a "dynamic" versus "static" language (granted that those are loose terms). That's far more than just type declarations or adaptor classes. You missed the point. That is not a merit of the language but of the library.
In Section
Perl News
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||