Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Old version of LWP::Agent

by parser (Acolyte)
on Apr 27, 2012 at 14:44 UTC ( [id://967654]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Old version of LWP::Agent
in thread Old version of LWP::Agent

Marshall, thank you for your measured and patient responses. I had no idea my post would cause such confusion. I am usually more articulate so this is a new experience for me.

When I first started using WWW::Mechanize I grew used to setting

use LWP::Debug qw(+);

as a simple sanity check to view feedback during my early prototyping phases. Once I need to perform more serious debugging I would use more focused tools such as tamper-data, live-headers, wireshark, etc.

It sounds like your use case is different than mine. I do not have a requirement to handle 3,000 URIs. I am automating interaction with a limited number of URIs but ones that have fairly complex interaction and formatting (lots of Dojo and Javascript). Having visibility into send and receive traffic (interspersed with my code) at a simple level is useful. Perhaps there is another mechanism I am overlooking besides LWP::Debug.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://967654]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (None)
    As of 2025-01-18 07:19 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      Which URL do you most often use to access this site?












      Results (56 votes). Check out past polls.