Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

by anazawa (Scribe)
on Aug 03, 2012 at 01:45 UTC ( #985141=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous
in thread 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

Thanks for your suggestion. Your code output the following: 
Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::each(), qualify as such or use & at a
+mbiguous_calls.pl line 12.
Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::chop(), qualify as such or use & at a
+mbiguous_calls.pl line 18.
dump() better written as CORE::dump() at ambiguous_calls.pl line 19.
Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::dump(), qualify as such or use & at a
+mbiguous_calls.pl line 19.
name: Ken Takakura
main::our() was called at ambiguous_calls.pl line 8.
Use of uninitialized value $person{"name"} in scalar chop at ambiguous
+_calls.pl line 18.
Abort

[download]

This result shows us that delete and our belong to "weak keywords", and each, chop and dump don't.

The following was quoted from regen/keywords.pl:

145: -chop
160: +delete
163: -dump
164: -each
261: +our

[download]

Plus (+) signs maybe mean "weak".

Your comment meant a lot to me :)

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://985141]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (8)
As of 2018-06-20 16:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (116 votes). Check out past polls.
    Notices?