Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks

Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

by anazawa (Scribe)

on Aug 03, 2012 at 01:45 UTC ( #985141=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous
in thread 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

Thanks for your suggestion. Your code output the following:

Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::each(), qualify as such or use & at a
+mbiguous_calls.pl line 12.
Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::chop(), qualify as such or use & at a
+mbiguous_calls.pl line 18.
dump() better written as CORE::dump() at ambiguous_calls.pl line 19.
Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::dump(), qualify as such or use & at a
+mbiguous_calls.pl line 19.
name: Ken Takakura
main::our() was called at ambiguous_calls.pl line 8.
Use of uninitialized value $person{"name"} in scalar chop at ambiguous
+_calls.pl line 18.
Abort
[download]

This result shows us that delete and our belong to "weak keywords", and each, chop and dump don't.

The following was quoted from regen/keywords.pl:

145: -chop
160: +delete
163: -dump
164: -each
261: +our
[download]

Plus (+) signs maybe mean "weak".

Your comment meant a lot to me :)

Comment on Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous Select or Download Code

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://985141]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others romping around the Monastery: (5)

As of 2019-02-16 00:04 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

I use postfix dereferencing ...

Results (95 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices^?