Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: camelCase vs snake_case

by Your Mother (Bishop)
on Aug 28, 2012 at 23:32 UTC ( #990353=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to camelCase vs snake_case

ThereAreNoRulesSoDoWhatYouLike there_are_no_rules_so_do_what_you_like

If my preference isn't obvious, you can consider other impossible to satisfy stylistic situations in things like XMLLib v XmlLib. I do think keeping to an expected style is good practice. E.g., the camel casing in XML::LibXML isn't annoying because it reflects the native/standard names.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://990353]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: hello crew! marto thanks for the message: but I how can I help? i'm testing cpan Padre atm problem with Client::Debug
[choroba]: I don't happen to have 5.10.0 nor 5.8.5 handy...
[Corion]: Hmm - I would say the 5.8.5 is a broken installation / corrupt tarball download, and the 5.10.0 is really weird, and maybe a bug in that version of Perl
[Corion]: I don't see how my $result = eval q{'abc' =~ ?b?}; could create a "Modification of read-only value" error
[marto]: Discipulus the issue that should be adressed is that the page needs to be updated to reflect modern perl on Windows
[Discipulus]: but is really necessary to support these ancient versions? from 5.14 onward is not enough?
[Discipulus]: yes marto I understood
[Corion]: Discipulus: I'm slowly migrating my code to require 5.8.x ;) Most of my code works on 5.6, but Filter::signatures requires 5.10 I think

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (10)
As of 2018-06-25 08:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?