Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re^4: Is there a more functional regex syntax?

by kennethk (Abbot)
on Sep 18, 2012 at 17:35 UTC ( #994319=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^3: Is there a more functional regex syntax?
in thread Is there a more functional regex syntax?

The regex suggested by tobyink above can make the single-line case much more readable

The advantage of mine is that it actually enforces format, which may or may not be of concern. I also like that you expect two values and you get two values; a little less slight of hand for maintenance. But I do appreciate the elegance of his choice of indices.

Also be aware you'll need to initialize @totals = (0,0) so that the index -1 doesn't map to your first term. tobyink does it, but didn't really emphasize its importance.

#11929 First ask yourself `How would I do this without a computer?' Then have the computer do it the same way.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://994319]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (12)
As of 2018-06-21 13:16 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (118 votes). Check out past polls.