Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

swissprot assignment

by faten daim
on Sep 25, 2012 at 20:54 UTC ( #995633=perlquestion: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
faten daim has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

Write a program that read from (swissprot_output.html) by using regular expression and subroutine by reference. Use the text file provided and ensure the output is exactly like below:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: swissprot assignment
by marto (Archbishop) on Sep 25, 2012 at 21:26 UTC

    You provide no input, show no desired output and want to skip the learning part of the exercise by asking others to do your coursework. That's not really what we do here. Show some effort, explain what problems you experienced.

Re: swissprot assignment
by erix (Parson) on Sep 26, 2012 at 06:46 UTC
Re: swissprot assignment
by bulk88 (Priest) on Sep 26, 2012 at 00:18 UTC
    aye aye captain

    edit: I feel it is better to not reap HW so profs can google it up. What do others in the monastery think?
      Looking at this thread, the most enlightening post is that the OP is most likely referencing interview question. Is this thread really worth keeping for that, especially given the trolling near the top? It's good of you to think of the hypothetical prof, but what's best for The Monastery should come first, and I am not seeing the benefit. But good question!!

      Elda Taluta; Sarks Sark; Ark Arks
      My deviantART gallery

        Is this thread really worth keeping

        That's the wrong question. A thread doesn't need to justify its worth in being kept. We should not remove a node merely because a few people fail to see any significant value in it. Not only is that just putting the onus on the wrong side of the equation for philosophical reasons, it also just leads to bad decision making. When that has happened in the past, there usually appear several people who saw the value and the node got restored.

        Somebody has to justify the (at least somewhat compelling) reason for its removal.

        Which is why considering a node with the reason of just "reap" is against documented practices for the use of "consideration".

        - tye        

        I do believe keeping trail of a rather badly executed attempt to cheat is best for The Monastery. I do hope the attempt is found by the interviewer, the culprit is treated accordingly and either eventually gets removed from the pool of (Perl) developers or is forced to learn what he or she is claiming he/she already knows. And it's even possible that a member of Monastery that did not lie in the CV as much as faten daim will get a chance at the interview and get the job instead.

        Enoch was right!
        Enjoy the last years of Rome.

      aye aye captain

      edit: I feel it is better to not reap HW so profs can google it up. What do others in the monastery think?

      This assumes it was actual homework -- highly doubtful

        Might be interview material as well. It is the first hit for swissprot_output.html, interestingly enough.
Re: swissprot assignment
by nemesdani (Friar) on Sep 25, 2012 at 20:55 UTC
    I'm beginning to understand JavaFan

    I'm too lazy to be proud of being impatient.

      What are you beginning to understand?

      What an odd thing to say

Re: swissprot assignment
by frozenwithjoy (Priest) on Sep 26, 2012 at 00:08 UTC
    Yes, sir! I'll get right on that.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: perlquestion [id://995633]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-07-17 07:57 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    It has been suggested to rename Perl 6 in order to boost its marketing potential. Which name would you prefer?

    Results (357 votes). Check out past polls.