Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling

Re: Anonymous Hash in Constructor

by jmlynesjr (Hermit)
on Oct 19, 2012 at 01:14 UTC ( #999838=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Anonymous Hash in Constructor

Wouldn't an anonymous hash provide for/enforce encapsulation, a basic OOP concept?



Thanks for the explanation. As always, I have more reading to do! My thought was that naming the hash would create a symbol table entry that would allow direct access from the outside, not that you would want to or should do that.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Anonymous Hash in Constructor
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Oct 19, 2012 at 05:01 UTC

      Which, of course, would not make sense to do.   The constructor’s purpose is to return a new unique instance of a blessed object as its return value.   So, the only “debate” here is whether, within the body of that constructor, the hash that is to be returned is specified anonymously or not.   And, it makes utterly no difference one way or the other to Perl.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://999838]
and the grasshoppers chirp...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (11)
As of 2018-06-22 10:16 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (124 votes). Check out past polls.