comment on

I've recently been debugging an old script. It predates our version control system. It predates our coding standards. It predates all our existing developers. As far as I can tell, it predates every tool we currently use, other than perl itself.

I've found some code that seems bizarre to me. There are a bunch of use constant declarations at the top, and they are used as array keys in some code that pretends to be object oriented, like so:

use constant PARENT => 0;
use constant PROGRESS => 1;

sub new
{
    my ($class) = @_;
    my $this = [];
    bless ($this, $class);
    
    $this->[PARENT] = undef;    
    $this->[PROGRESS] = 0;
    
    return $this;
}
[download]

To me, this looks like a dodgy cargo cult way of doing an ordered hash. But then I started wondering, what if it simply predates hashes? Can anyone shed any light on this? (before I remove all history of my interaction with this file...)

In reply to Is this ancient perl or just a cargo cult? by nevdka

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks