![]() |
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
// was standard in 5.10 and available in 5.8.x with a series of patches, so that one is not the best reason to require 5.12 (instead of 5.10). Using my version of perlver-fast:
Whatever the reasoning behind a minimal requirement is, as long as the argumentation is good enough, it is acceptable. Dropping support for alder perl releases does not mean that the releases of a module that are available on CPAN (and BackPAN) suddenly stop working. If raising the minimal supported version of perl (for whatever reason) raises the quality as that increases test coverage, I won't object. A reason not to raise that bar is if your module is way up-river, and thus also raises the minimal supported perl version to all the modules that require yours. Just something to consider. Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn In reply to Re^2: 2021 is the year to drop support for Perl < 5.12?
by Tux
|
|