Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

Excellent comments, Eyes.   Now, I happen to work as a software consultant, so I usually wind up walking into either “active fires” or, more likely, “smoking ruins.”   The project has usually reached and passed its turning burning-point.   Heads have rolled, and the best people have quit.   So, one of the first things that I try to do is to look at the team’s work-flow organization, or lack thereof.

Superficially, this is (for instance) their ticketing system.   But, on a larger scale, it is the entire process of how changes and new tasks are introduced into their team workflow and how they are vetted before being formally introduced.   I also look at who within the business the team effectively answers to:   usually, this person is part of the marketing department.   Is the team’s approach pro-active or reactionary?   How much do people believe that they actually have an influence on how their department’s daily activities are run?   Why do they think that, when starting on a particular work-order, they actually possess all of the information they need in order to complete and then to test it?   How many of the subsequent “bug reports” are actually design changes, or the ex post facto reactionary discovery of defects or omissions in the design?

I have actually very rarely encountered an actual “know-it-all,” although I have encountered a fair number of people who initially struck me as being very obnoxious.   I once unfortunately worked with a team that I privately thought of as “Mark, Carl, and their Ten Little Indians,” because the bean-counters had swallowed wholesale the idea that H-1B non-immigrant visa holders (from India) were “cheaper,” but also that they were quite “expendable” and “interchangeable.”   Many of the Indians were foundering, poorly trained or not at all, and got shifted from one project to another by the accountants.   (Of course, an absolutely untenable situation for them!)   Really, only Mark and Carl knew what the project was about, and, during my engagement, Carl (a true old-hand) left.   I felt that Mark was soon to follow, although he did not do so before my engagement ended.

I happen to think that, if a programming team has conflict, it is best addressed as a symptom.   It is an indication of the fact that the team feels that they are in a pressure-cooker, and the surface boiling is probably a warning of much bigger organizational problems than that.   Sometimes, managers are promoted from the programming ranks without being given programming training, but I don’t see that nearly as much as I used to.   (Today, there are usually two parallel tracks – technical, and project-management – and I think that this is an improvement.)   I also don’t generally think that managers are actually the autocratic blow-hards that their teams might say they are (behind their backs).

I usually recommend that organizations should expose their technical implementation, testing, and other related teams to project management perspectives and issues, although w-i-t-h-o-u-t swallowing the kool-aid of “self-directed teams.”   Technicians need to see their work as the business does.   But the business(!) also needs to better understand how computer software actually works.

I read a little e-book called Managing the Mechanism ... I have never seen it on a shelf ... that had a lot of influence on my thinking.   The premise behind this book is that software is a self-directing, autonomous software automaton.


In reply to Re: Conflict in Teams by sundialsvc4
in thread Conflict in Teams by eyepopslikeamosquito

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others perusing the Monastery: (4)
    As of 2020-10-24 01:25 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?
      My favourite web site is:












      Results (242 votes). Check out past polls.

      Notices?