comment on

As usual it's an excellent read, and as usual he makes reference to Perl, as usual damning it with faint praise.

Personally, I didn't think it was very faint. Quite the opposite. I've always had the impression that PG rather likes Perl - probably because of the stuff it stole from LISP ;-)

I'll also admit I'm probably standing too close to see the forest for the trees, so you tell me, what is stunningly bad in Perl?

For me stunningly bad things are:

The cryptic $\, etc. variables.
Lack of good encapsulation.

Those two things alone would remove 90% of the FUD I have to deal with when advocating Perl.

The Perl 5 VM is also a very, very scary thing (well - the source code scares me anyway :-) Messing with the op/parse tree at run time can be hugely useful since you can create domain specific languages really easily. A good abstract VM makes this simple (yay Parrot!)

(Please include the standard "I like perl and think its advantages more than outweigh its disadvantages" disclaimer ;-)

In reply to Re: "There are some stunningly novel ideas in Perl" -- Paul Graham by adrianh
in thread "There are some stunningly novel ideas in Perl" -- Paul Graham by grinder

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks